Verdict. Kia has upped its game with the new Sportage, especially in this circa-$50,000 part of the segment. It is absolutely packed with comfort, tech and safety features and it’s hard to beat when it comes to value. The fact that it offers such an engaging drive experience is a bonus, and a credit to the local team. Verdict. The Mitsubishi ASX ES is a compact SUV that, surprisingly, can fit its occupants with relative comfort. The boot is a good size and you have just enough up front to satisfy a driver for everyday use. The size makes it perfect for urban dwellers and the ongoing costs are fantastic. Kia Stonic vs Toyota Raize Comparison. Find below the detailed Cars comparison of Kia Stonic and Toyota Raize, based on price, specifications, & other features. We have the Kia Stonic priced at ₱835,000 , while Toyota Raize is priced at ₱751,000 . If we compare the technical specifications, Kia Stonic houses 1368 engine whereas Toyota Raize The Arona, for example, offers a 400-litre boot with the seats up, but offers a smaller fuel tank than any of its rivals in this comparison. According to VW, the T-Roc offers 445-litres of boot space with the seats up and 1,290 litres with the seats folded down. Clockwise from top left: Hyundai Kona, Kia Stonic, VW T-Roc, SEAT Arona. Na Autohledu porovnáváme Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 MIVEC 2019 vs Hyundai Kona 1.0 T-GDI 2021 včetně všech parametrů, motorizací a ceny. Porovnejte auta na jednom místě! materi pkn kelas 9 semester 1 pdf. Zobrazené 1 až 2 z 2 (1 stránok) Stierače Kia Stonic sú aj v našej ponuke! Ponúkame vám stierače HQ Automotive, ktoré zabezpečia čistotu a jasný výhľad z vášho čelného skla v akomkoľvek nepriaznivom počasí. The small SUV market is growing bigger and bigger as more manufacturers are trying to squeeze into it. These four – the Hyundai Kona, Kia Stonic, SEAT Arona and VW T-Roc – are the newest, with two offering value for money and two offering a slightly more premium feel. So how do they all compare? Clockwise from top left: Hyundai Kona, Kia Stonic, VW T-Roc, SEAT Arona Prices The entry-level Hyundai Kona (top left in all our galleries) is the least expensive car here, undercutting the equivalent Kia Stonic (top right) and SEAT Arona (bottom left) by £100 and £360 respectively. The Kona comes with air conditioning, Bluetooth, DAB radio, cruise control and electric windows as standard, but the standard infotainment screen is tiny and looks horribly dated. For £17,495, SE spec nabs fog lights, a much more modern seven-inch infotainment screen, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, lumbar support and a reversing camera. You can spend up to £24,995 on a Premium GT spec, but we’d forgo it for either of the other ‘Premium’ trims that offer most of the goodies while costing noticeably less. So far there are currently just two Stonic trims to choose from – the entry-level, £16,295 ‘2’ and the £19,695 First Edition. With Apple and Android connectivity, automatic headlights, rear parking sensors and air con as standard, ‘2’ is well-equipped for the price. Meanwhile, the higher spec adds satellite navigation, keyless entry, heated front seats, automatic braking, high beam assist and start/stop. Unlike the Stonic, you’ll have to get a mid-spec Arona if you’re after Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, while only top-spec trims have sat-nav. That said, it’s slightly better for safety kit because all models get automatic emergency braking as standard, which will automatically stop you from low speeds the system detects an imminent collision. You’ll have to dig deeper if you want a VW T-Roc (bottom right) – an entry-level SE model will set you back £20,425. Although seeing as even this entry-level model get 17-inch alloys, automatic emergency braking, front and rear parking sensors, start/stop, a large touchscreen and adaptive cruise control, it’s fairly good value for money. Design trim adds cosmetic upgrades and SEL offers 18-inch wheels, sat-nav and VW’s brilliant Active Info Display screen that replaces analogue dials. Clockwise from top left: Hyundai Kona, Kia Stonic, VW T-Roc, SEAT Arona Styling It’s safe to say that the Kona is one of the most striking small SUVs on sale, with an aggressive front end featuring split-level lights like you get on a Nissan Juke or Citroen C3 Aircross. The black plastic cladding makes it look more like a larger SUV, although it can look a bit of a jumble from some angles. Compared to the Hyundai, the Stonic looks slightly conservative, but it still looks smart and rugged. In fact, if you squint it looks pretty similar to the VW T-Roc, especially in a monochrome colour and viewed from the side. Both the Kona and Stonic need bright colours to look their best, and the VW looks smart in any colour, but spec a contrasting roof for the best effect if you’re shopping for an eye-catching T-Roc. But perhaps the sharpest-looking car in this test is the SEAT, with sharp lines and a sportier look than the others. It’s taller than the Ibiza on which it’s based, but is still desirable and sleek. Clockwise from top left: Hyundai Kona, Kia Stonic, VW T-Roc, SEAT Arona Interior There’s a bit of a mismatch between the Kona’s exterior and interior – that’s because the innards are a bit boring. There are coloured inserts, but otherwise it’s not very interesting and some of the plastics and fittings feel a bit flimsy. On the plus side, all the controls are easy to use, there’s a lot of steering-wheel and seat adjustment and there’s just enough room for tall people to get comfy in the back. Like the Kona, the Stonic’s cabin is easy to use but feels dreary and lifeless. The optional leather seats don’t hold you in place if you drive like a loon and they go without electric adjustment, the touchscreen is hard to use when moving and taller passengers will find it a bit of a squeeze in the rear. At least it gets an infotainment system as standard, though – entry-level Aronas go without a coloured screen, which might make you question what decade we’re in. Opt for the infotainment and the interior looks smart and rugged, especially with coloured inserts, and there’s plenty of space for tall people and child seats. The T-Roc has the best interior here and it’s taken mostly from the latest Polo. Colourful trim pieces really lift the interior and a touchscreen is standard-fit. It’s not too bad in the back for leg and headroom, either. Clockwise from top left: Hyundai Kona, Kia Stonic, VW T-Roc, SEAT Arona Practicality The Kona’s interior scores some points back when it comes to practicality. It hast a big glovebox, lots of cubbies to hide things out of view, a sunglasses holder, an adjustable boot floor and seats that almost fold flat. In fact, only the size of the boot lets it down, as 334 litres (or 361 if you go for the entry-level ‘S’ without a spare wheel) and 1,116 litres seats down isn’t really competitive in this market. It’s swings and roundabouts with the Stonic, because the glovebox is smaller than the Kona’s but the door bins are large enough to hold both a bottle and a bottle at the same time. The boot floor is adjustable and usefully flat, and there are lots of tethering points, but 352 litres/ 1,155 litres of boot space isn’t as much as some rivals. The Arona, for example, offers a 400-litre boot with the seats up, but offers a smaller fuel tank than any of its rivals in this comparison. According to VW, the T-Roc offers 445-litres of boot space with the seats up and 1,290 litres with the seats folded down. Clockwise from top left: Hyundai Kona, Kia Stonic, VW T-Roc, SEAT Arona Engines and driving For the time being, there are only two engine options for the Kona. On the top-spec Premium GT model there’s a 177hp petrol with four-wheel drive and comfy independent rear suspension, but choose a model from the rest of the range and you’re limited to a three-cylinder turbo petrol unit delivering 120hp and a 0-62 time of 12 seconds. It’s perfectly adequate most of the time but struggles slightly up steep hills. Overall, the Hyundai is good to drive and there’s little road noise so long as you avoid the optional larger alloy wheels. The Stonic offers a similar turbocharged engine to the Kona, as well as a non-turbo unit producing 99hp. Either the engine or the torquey diesel will suit most people’s needs best. The latter gets close to its claimed 67mpg fuel economy and pulls well. The Stonic is manual-only, front-wheel-drive-only and has light steering, while the suspension is good but the car rolls a lot through bends. In our Kia Stonic review we say it’s best at a relaxed pace, so perhaps isn’t one for the keener drivers. The Arona and T-Roc also share some of their engines. Both are available with 115hp petrols and diesels, and a 150hp turbo petrol with cylinder deactivation for better fuel economy. The Arona adds 94hp versions of both the lower-powered petrol and the diesel, while its VW cousin offers a diesel with either 150hp or 190hp – the latter being auto-only and four-wheel-drive. Strangely, the 115hp petrol is only available with an automatic gearbox in the SEAT and manual-only in the VW, and the is only available on the Arona’s FR trim. It’s worth noting that the Arona has firmer suspension than the VW, but even the FR’s adaptive dampers can’t make the suspension as soft and comfy as the T-Roc’s. Clockwise from top left: Hyundai Kona, Kia Stonic, VW T-Roc, SEAT Arona Verdict These four are all competent mini-SUVs and the best one depends entirely on your priorities. The Kona and Stonic cover the value end well, with the Kona being good to drive and sharply styled and the Stonic offering lots of equipment and load-lugging practicality. Both have long warranties too – the Hyundai has five years, while the Kia is covered for an impressive seven. The Arona bridges the gap between its rivals and offers a great compromise between sportiness, practicality, style and value. That said, the entry-level model is best avoided because it just doesn’t feel special. If you’re after a premium-feeling small SUV, the T-Roc could suit your needs. It’s one of the biggest small SUVs with good practicality, strong engines and a stylish interior. If you’re still undecided, see how much you can save on each model through carwow! Other Names: Also called: -- Also called: -- Kia Stonic S 2021 review | cheap-as-chips base manual crossover Kia Stonic 2021 review – Will the hot new baby SUV ruffle a few feathers? 2021 Kia Stonic - Exterior and interior Details 2021 Kia Stonic GT-Line Launch Review | Kia Stonic S 2021 review | cheap-as-chips base manual crossover Kia Stonic 2021 review – Will the hot new baby SUV ruffle a few feathers? Feature: 2020 Kia Stonic 2021 Kia Stonic - Exterior and interior Details 2020 Mitsubishi ASX/RVR In depth Tour Interior and Exterior The new 2020 Mitsubishi ASX test drive and review Mitsubishi ASX 2020 review 2020 Mitsubishi ASX: 5 Things you need to know from the Australian first drive Mitsubishi ASX 2017, in Slovak Review 2020 Mitsubishi ASX Plus MIVEC 5MT MY2020 - Kaufberatung MITSUBISHI ASX OUTLANDER SPORT RVR VARIOUS OFF ROAD TESTS Mitsubishi ASX 2017, TV Advert, commercial Transmission: Continuously Variable-speed Automatic 0 Sister companies Kia and Hyundai are both in the process of developing a small crossover vehicle, both of which are set to hit the popular small SUV segment later this recently revealed spy shots of the upcoming small Kia SUV model, which is tentatively being called the most recent spy shots showed the vehicle in heavy camouflage, but from what we can see today, it looks like it’s going to be a great looking will be Kia’s first entry into the small SUV segment, a smart move given how quickly the segment has been growing in Europe and Asia. It is now also starting to gain some real traction in the makes sense that Hyundai and Kia, as well as other automakers, are now testing the waters of the small SUV segment. What this means is the that Stonic is going to have some competition to deal thought it might be a good idea to look at the segment, and take a closer peek into the cars like Kia Stonic, which are as follows:Nissan Juke – This was actually the vehicle that started the segment a little over 5 years ago. It has been a sales success for Nissan, and the second-generation model will be hitting the market next year. The Juke is likely to be the biggest of the competitors of the Kia Captur – This Kia Stonic rival is based on the Juke, and it has been a huge hit in Europe, going as far as landing in the top 10 best sellers in the CX-3 – This model has become very popular, thanks in large part to its design, driving characteristics, and fuel economy. Another one that is sure to offer stiff C-HR – New to the segment, but one that is still sure to be a big rival. The Toyota powertrain used in this model is a winner, and the coupe styling is incredibly cool. It’s a FWD model only, but you can also get it as a 500X – This is certainly one of the better looking vehicles on the market, and this one comes with AWD and more passenger and cargo space than the Fiat 500 small Renegade – You can’t create a list of Kia Stonic rivals without mentioning the entry level model from Jeep. They don’t come much better as an off-road vehicle than this Trax – Also known as the Opel Mokka in Europe and the Buick Encore in the US, this model is starting to gain popularity. Pricing is excellent, and it is loaded with a ton of features. out of 5 starsContentsIntroductionBuild QualityValue for MoneyMaintenanceNoise LevelBrakingAcceleration/PowerGear ShiftingSuspension & HandlingFuel EfficiencyInterior DesignBoot Size & ComfortFeaturesShould You Buy One? IntroductionThis is Kia’s smallest through the marketing materials on Kia’s website, I came across the dot-point explaining how this tiny SUV was ‘Insta-worthy.’It’s a phrase that’s rung throughout my head and stuck with me whenever I think of this car. It made me curious about what that means, and who this car is targeted what I can tell, this Kia is designed to target first time drivers, or those seeking a smaller but more roomy hatch for inner-city I put on my best pair of Converse, jumped into the driver’s seat of the Stonic, and imagined what it would be like to have this car as my ‘first car.’ Build Quality4 out of 5. I tested the GT Line variant of the Stonic, which is the range topper, offering more premium materials like a leather styled steering wheel and quality on the outside is solid. You can push, push and knock everything from the centre console through to the doors, and you’ll be comfortable knowing this car can withstand some rough the outside, it’s all standard practice. There’s accurate panel gaps, easy to operate doors and plenty of tire walls to prevent constantly worrying about those 17-inch wheels scraping the small factor when it comes to the side skirts, just make sure you don’t step on them (as indicated by a warning sticker) as they aren’t rated to carry a person if you intend to use them as a step to access the for Money4 out of 5. This is the range topping Stonic, priced from $30,490. This is quite a step up from the base price of $23, those lucky ones that are grabbing the GT Line, you’ll find plenty of features for the price. These features include keyless entry/exit, partial leather seats, a sunroof, upgraded wheels, more power and a dual clutch automatic you’re a parent looking to buy a new car for your child or don’t like spending all that cash for those upgrades, the base Stonic’s space and styling will be plenty for a first car. As a Gen Z baby, all I’d really care about is if my phone can connect to Apple CarPlay for maps and music, which the base car already you’re looking for a larger hatch and this isn’t your first car, the GT Line will make life a lot easier with all the creature comforts found Stonic feels more premium, with a more up-market cabin than its base model a small SUV, the Stonic is right in the affordable bracket for a new car, as the top-of-the-range model barely tops out above $30,000. It represents value in the form of an easy-to-drive and more spacious alternative to a lower-to-the-ground out of 5. The Stonic comes with a 7 year/unlimited kilometre warranty, which is very to fill the Stonic up with a full tank of fuel? That’ll set you back around $65 on average. It’s not exactly cheap, but you shouldn’t see the Stonic chew through that fuel unlike some heavier SUV’ also get capped price servicing, with the total cost of these services over 7 years or 70,000km of driving coming to $3, a year-by-year and kilometre break-down of the total servicing costs for the Stonic:IntervalCost1 Year or 10,000 km$2832 Years or 20,000 km$4843 Years or 30,000 km$3384 Years or 40,000 km$7045 Years or 50,000 km$3196 Years or 60,000 km$6027 Years or 70,000 km$569Total$3,299Noise Level3 out of 5. For daily driving, and for a road trip, you’re going to be happy with the sound system on the clear, with an acceptable amount of depth and volume to the sound played out of these speakers - this is a far better alternative to a car’s stereo from 5-10 years to these speakers via Apple CarPlay is a safe and legal way to interact with your podcasts or music while on the move. Again, this is an improvement from having to pull-over or queue your music on your phone to just interacting with the engine in the GT Line was an interesting one, as it’s a turbocharged three cylinder. Under heavy acceleration, it’ll provide V6-likeness with the sound it produces, which can be a little more fun than listening to a straining inline noise was present, but nothing too overbearing. Wind noise, even with roof-rails fitted, was never a present issue when driving around in the out of 5. This is a really simple isn’t a performance car, it’s just meant to be comfortable, and that’s what the brakes did so is a very light car in the modern world, weighing in at just over 1,200kg. Being lightweight didn’t affect the braking ability of the Stonic to be too sudden or sharp. Rather, you could be easy and smooth on the brakes, with little out of 5. On paper, this is a disappointing power plant. This is a 1L turbocharged three cylinder producing 74kW @ 6000rpm and 172Nm @ power to weight ratio however, is around 60kW per tonne, which isn’t the worst ratio in the world, but it’s certainly nowhere near enough for a ‘sporty drive.’Here’s the best part: that’s not what the Stonic is meant to be. It’s not meant to be a sports car, instead, reading these specifications for the engine is only going to persuade parents to purchase this car to drive their child in. It’s enough power to get around, but certainly not enough to get in big off the line, and powering up the Stonic GT Line, you do have to dig deeper into the accelerator pedal to really get it going. Simply due to a lack of an AWD system, and the fact it’s missing some additional not going to win any drag races, but the powerplant does make for a good economical and sensible choice to save money on fuel. You have a choice of three drive modes, with Eco being the mode the car always starts up in. A personal pet peeve I have is when a car starts up automatically in the worst drive mode, but it’s easy enough to never found myself driving around in Sport mode, as I didn’t see a point to this. Instead, I drove around in Normal mode, and found myself with enough responsiveness from the engine and gearbox to get from A to B with no out of 5. Dual-clutch transmission in small SUVs have become more prominent in recent years, with the worst example found in the Nissan can be jerky and awkward at low speeds, but really shine when you need the gearbox to be responsive in shifts - something you certainly don’t need in the Stonic, I actually found that the gearbox offered the relaxed experience of a dual-clutch, while also being crisp to shift when getting up to the speed never felt the need to shift manually as it’s certainly not a car designed to benefit from you shifting your own liked the fact that the Stonic GT-Line came with a dual-clutch, as it drove with greater sophistication than a CVT, however it did lack the smoothness of a traditional was noticeable during low-speed manoeuvres, especially when reversing. At low speeds, when tapping the throttle, the transmission was on occasion just that little bit too jerky for a seamless & out of 5. Being a lifted hatchback, the Stonic did have noticeable body roll, and certainly was designed to be my initial drive back home, I really wasn’t loving how numb the steering was, and at higher speeds through corners, you’ll be guessing where the wheels are more often than it’s going to be comfortable for long trips and across potholes, and is really smooth out the it comes to how the Stonic drives, the vehicle is moreso a bit of a box on wheels; it’ll get the job done and do it comfortably, however it just won’t match it’s sporty out of 5. The combined fuel consumption of this vehicle is claimed to be averaged around 7L/100km whilst driving around town, where you’re most likely going to be driving the Stonic most of the a fuel efficient car, however it does have a small 45L tank. It might be good on fuel, but on long trips it might not go as far as you’d out of 5. The interior of the Stonic is basic, that’s for sure. What I did enjoy in the GT-Line were the additional little design cues that carried on from the has a design cue called the ‘Tiger Nose’, and it’s found almost everywhere on the Stonic, from the windshield, the grill to the pattern on the seat and the dashboard. It’s a nice little detail that feels like some attention to detail has been spent infotainment and dash layout is all very standard - there’s nothing special to note here, apart from the easy intriguing touch is the faux carbon fibre weave adorning the dashboard, which could be a little out of place in a car with seemingly no intention to be mistaken for a sports really does feel like a lifted-up hatchback on the inside, as that’s what this car truly is. The main advantage this cabin has over a traditional hatchback is your view out. Apart from that, you’ve got yourself a fairly standard Kia interior with a modern design that adequately meets what you’d expect from a $30,000 Size & Comfort4 out of 5. There’s a minimum of 352L of boot space, and if you fold the 60:40 split seats down, you’ll get a maximum of 1155L. A thoughtful shelf can also be found back here to stop loose items rolling around in the a fairly large boot even without the seats folded down, and when you do open up the interior space a little more, there’s definitely enough space to head away on a long road seats offer chair-like comfort, with plenty of cushion and support, however the rear seats might feel a little tight for those taller than 6 feet. To help with this, there are cutouts in the roof that will help with headroom, but those with longer legs will feel the brunt of the smaller proportions of this SUV the two people, the Stonic will be more than adequate for longer road trips. With a 60:40 split, you could even take 3 people and their luggage away out of 5. If you’re looking for radar cruise, heated seats or all-wheel drive, unfortunately the Stonic won’t deliver you get enough features to make daily driving as well as longer drives comfortable enough. However, you’ll need to spend a little more if you’re looking for more luxury appointments a list of features you can expect to find on the Kia Stonic GT Line: turbocharged three-cylinder petrol engine74kW, 172NmInfotainment8-inch colour touchscreenApple CarPlay/Android AutoBluetooth connectivitySafetyAEBRear view cameraLane Keep AssistLane Following AssistDriver Attention WarningPerformanceGT specific body kit and interior17-inch alloy wheelsDrive modesConveniencePush button start/stopHeated and electric folding side mirrorsSunroofLED lights Should you buy one?As a viable and sensible option for a first car, the Stonic delivers. It’s cheap to run, well-built, safe and easy to well suited for a new driver, and also for anyone looking for a small SUV that’s easy to park in the inner-city. Outside those buyers, the Stonic is a tad under-powered and possibly lacks a few features you could find on a regular hatchback, like a Hyundai a cute and attractive SUV - and is certainly Insta-worthy - but I’ll leave it up to you if you think it’ll look good on your feed. About the author Cameron is your typical car nut, but also drives and writes about cars for ProductReview.

kia stonic vs mitsubishi asx